The three
writers of the articles have used social media to create a sort of identity for
themselves. By choosing not to post the
“fake” picture on Facebook, Erin Zammett Ruddy chose to keep herself an honest
person and to not seem fake, even on social media. Kima Jones and Bev Gooden have used social
media in order to spread a message and form more of a group identity. Kima Jones discussed how she, as well as many
others, uses Twitter to spread her writing to others. Apparently, many people of minority,
including Kima, use social media as a tool to spread their writing because it
is typically harder for them to do so otherwise. Bev Gooden created #WhyIStayed on Twitter
initially to answer the question of “why does she stay?” from her personal
experience, but it then grew into something bigger. She created a sort of identity for women who
stayed in abusive relationships. As she
said in the article, she was not supporting staying in an abusive
relationship. Rather, she and these
other women were answering the question of why they stayed, as well as allowing
others to know they are definitely not alone.
Harris might say these three authors
are creating discourse communities based on the way they speak. For example, Kima Jones and the other people
of Twitter communicate through poetry, sending strong messages through words
that not everyone is willing to hear.
Harris says “…They (theorists) have helped us to see that it is only
through being part of some ongoing discourse that we can, as individual writers,
have things like points to make and purposes to achieve.” By speaking to people of their own discourse
community, these individual writers are able to put their words on social
media, creating a stronger message and making points with a whole group of
people. When explaining David
Bartholomae’s quote, Harris says “We do not write simply as individuals, but we
do not write simply as members of a community either.” Each person on social media, including the
authors of the three articles, has something to say, important or not. Everyone will have points that other people
agree with and they will also have points that no one else will agree with at
all. This is essentially why no one is
completely a member of the writing community, but also not completely an
individual writer.
The only online community I am really a
part of is Facebook, though I rarely use it anyway. This community is marked by discourse because
although you can write a lot if you choose, people’s posts and comments are typically
shorter. That is how Facebook is—shorter,
more direct comments are usually expected.
You write that, "By speaking to people of their own discourse community, these individual writers are able to put their words on social media, creating a stronger message and making points with a whole group of people." This made me wonder how you think social media allowed them to make their point stronger? Is it just getting it out to a larger audience that makes it stronger, or is there something about social media--about the kinds of affording says and discursive ask it allows for--that makes our messages seem stronger?
ReplyDeleteThe idea you mention from Bstholomae also makes me think about the ways we as users shape the discourse of social media but are also shaved by its existing discourse. A while ago, I realize that sometimes when things happen in my life, I think about them in terms of Facebook statuses. What does that say about the power of existing discourses?